Running Head Social Work Values - 1966 Words

Running Head: SOCIAL WORK VALUES 1 Title Name Date Course SOCIAL WORK VALUES 2 Introduction Over the course of time there have been factions of organizations created to preserve the best interest of mankind. Primarily, those factions range from health relations to social enhancement. With regards social enhancement, one of the biggest factions dedicated to advancing human interest, is the social work profession. Briefly, the primary goal of the social work profession is to advance human well-being while helping meet the basic needs of humans. In addition, social workers engage in the particular needs of empowerment for people who are fragile, oppressed and subjected to poverty (Code of Ethics (English and Spanish) - National†¦show more content†¦Moreover, commitment and caring allows one to be passionate about the work they are doing. Most importantly, being accountable on behalf of your actions creates great character. Simply, accountability builds the discipline of adhering to your decisions and actions. Accountability shows the expectation one demands for their action. In comparison to the core values on behalf of the NASW Code of Ethics, my core values represent the persona each social worker should have with regards to helping those in need. Specifically honesty compared to the NASW Code of Ethics means that a social worker should also have transparency. With regards to commitment, it compares to the core values because it is allows social workers to express dedication to helping clients. Caring compares to each of the standard core values because ultimately via all core values a culture of caring is being expressed. Following suite, accountability is important because social workers are relied on to fight the battle for victims who cannot fend for themselves. In that event, they most uphold their duty to help. In contrast, my core values fail to differ because my core values aim to advance the well-being of humans. Furthermore, if any value lack adhering to the core values of the code of ethics, one can conclude that those are not viable values. Vignette #2 For the purpose of this paper, I chose vignette two to discuss. Primarily, this scenario hasShow MoreRelatedBusiness Ethics and Social Responsibility Essay1471 Words   |  6 PagesEthics in the workplace help the organization to grow and prosper. They bring about leadership, work culture and literacy. Ethic are beliefs about what’s right or wrong and good or bad based on individual’s values and morals, plus a behavior social context. Ethical behavior conforms to individual beliefs and social norms about what’s right and good. Unethical behavior conforms to individual beliefs and social norms about what’s wrong or bad. Business ethics refers to ethical or unethical behavior byRead MoreOrganizational Culture : Toyota Motors1121 Words   |  5 Pagess beliefs, ideologies, principles and values that its employees share. The organizational is called strong when employees of an organization respond to stimulus because of their following to the organization s values and when the employees do things because they believe it is the right thing to do. On the other hand, the organizational culture considered weak when employees of an organization don t perform their work following the organization s values, and they do things because they have toRead MoreRoles And Responsibilities Of A School975 Words   |  4 Pagesup of a team of maximum 20. They are responsible of running the school. The team will consist of different people who have links with the school or the local community. There will be at least 1 parent and 1 staff governor, and also the head teacher. Additional governors will be a support staff governor and a local authority governor who is chosen by the local authority, and also a local community governor. Governors work together with the head teacher and the senior management team. They are rarelyRead MoreIdentofy the Main Types of State and Independant Schools Essay1631 Words   |  7 Pagespaid by parents and also income fro m investments, gifts and charitable endowments which sets them apart from the local authority. This means that just over half of independent schools have charitable status, meaning they can claim tax exemption. The Head Teacher and governors decide on the admissions policy and they do not have to follow the National Curriculum. These schools are obliged to register with the Department for Education (DfE) so that they can be monitored on a regular basis by the IndependentRead MoreStarbucks Strategy1531 Words   |  7 Pages Running head: STARBUCKS’ STRATEGY1 Dr. Shavers Assignment 1: Starbucks’s Strategy Modern Management Strayer University October 21, 2014 Submitted by: RUNNING HEAD: STARBUCKS’ STRATEGY2 Starbuck’s Coffee is a multi-billion dollar company. It was founded in 1971 in Seattle, Washington. It was a single store located in the Park Place Market area of Seattle. The idea started with three friends, Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegel, and Gordon Bowker. They opened a small shop and beganRead MoreRoles And Responsibilities Of The School1717 Words   |  7 Pages10 to 12 people, but in some cases there could be up to 20. These people have the responsibility of running the school. The governing team will be made up of a variety of different people who will have links with the school and the local community. At least one parent governer and at least one staff member should join the headteacher to make up this team. Governors will work closely with the Head Teacher and Senior Management Team and also will be based on different committees who then are responsibleRead MoreEssay On Web Analytics850 Words   |  4 PagesRunning head: THE 10/90 RULE The 10/90 Rule 2 2 For years, web analytics has proven to be a means that revolutionize the way businesses are organized online. From an organization’s site, it would be easy to track every click of each individual who visits the website (Kaushik, 2010). However, the revolution has not been a success since most marketers and analysts have not paid attention to data on the Web and have mainly limited it to ClickStream data. Ideally, it has been important to rethink theRead MoreBrazil s Demographic Distribution Of Brazil1551 Words   |  7 PagesRunning head: BRAZIL 2 Demographic Distribution Brazil is the chief nation in South America with a population of 201,032,714, sustaining a growth rate of 0.9% and a population density of 24 per square km. According to the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA], 2014, â€Å"As the largest country it share borders with the Atlantic Ocean and every South American countryRead MoreLeadership And Hofstedes Six Dimensions1493 Words   |  6 PagesLeadership and Hofstede s Six Dimensions The Hofstede six dimension model s a study or theory, put forth by Professor Geer Hofstede, on how values in the work place are influenced by cultural differences around the world. The Model analyzes different countries on a scale from one to a hundred in six of the different categories. The categories in the model include; Power Distance Index, Individualism versus Collectivism, Masculinity versus Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance Index, Long Term OrientationRead MoreUnit 205 Teaching1149 Words   |  5 Pagespupils achievements. Responsible for finance of the school and may be involved in devising the curriculum. b) Head Teacher- Main responsibilities include being accountable to the governing body for progress of the school. Head Teacher is responsible for managing staff, pupils and school as a whole. c) Deputy Head- Deputy Head is to work alongside the head teacher and ensure running of the school is up to standard. May have to teach in cases of absence. d) Teachers- Role is to deliver education

Gender and Sexuality in Culture - 1053 Words

Diversity or rather, the lack of understanding diversity may be one of the most prevalent issues in the world today. Though the World Wide Web has bridged the cultural gap some, it will never fully or accurately reveal the truth simply because it is difficult to fully understand cultural meanings from an outsider’s perspective. Before the internet, careers in anthropology and similar fields made information available through ethnographic readings and studies. A key inquiry anthropologists seek to answer is the distinction between and role of sex, gender, and sexuality within each separate culture. Y The Last Man and other ethnographic texts connect culture, its language, and the formation of gender, sex, and sexuality roles in any given†¦show more content†¦A more specific type of cultural oppression is what Amazons feel that men have over women. Amazons portrayed in Y are an extremist group of women who believe that the men died for a reason, and they intend to embrace the new freedom and control given to them by Mother Earth (Vaughan, 96). Subjugation that these women felt from their male counterpart was apparently detrimental to their lives. In â€Å"The Sworn Virgins of Albania†, women decide to take on a male status for various reasons such as protection, avoiding an arranged marriage, and keeping the family name (Young, 253). With all men extinct, the sworn virgins would have no need to exist. According to â€Å"Different Words, Different Worlds†, men’s authority over women is seen through chivalrous acts such as opening a door. What they believe is in fact happening is that the man gives the woman permission to walk first, but he can easily take that consent away just the same, thus confirming he has the control (Tannen, 231). Language is another tool used to control and belittle. Language is only fully understood within the context of its culture. After the Amazon leader is called a cunt by a rebelling girl, she explains there is no longer offense in the word since the men made society see it in a negative light and disregard its ancient historical meaning of all-powerful (Vaughan, 112). In the movie Ma Vie en Rose,Show MoreRelatedPopular Culture Affect Gender and Sexuality1388 Words   |  6 PagesGender is a sociological factor which is a set of relationships, attributes, roles, beliefs and attitudes of human. On the other hand, sexuality can be referred into two traits. First is Biological; second is Physiological. Biological trait is about the difference of sex organs, the production of estrogen or testosterone. Physiological trait is about the difference of facial features, size of bones, shoulders, muscles, fatty issues. According to American Psychological Association, gender and sexualityRead More The Social Construction of Gender and Sexuality Essa y1361 Words   |  6 Pagesexemplifies the definition of gender as a concept; gender is the expectations of a sex according to the culture of society. Sexuality, within this definition of gender, reflects society’s expectations, which are created in relation to the opposite sex. The variances between cultures means that gender expectations change within different cultures. These expectations put pressure on each member of society to conform and abide by the folkways of their own culture. The creation of gender expectations by societyRead MoreModern Culture : The Japanese Manga A Sub Culture Based Around Graphic Novels1606 Words   |  7 PagesIn Japanese modern culture, patriarchal constructs rule everyday ideology of what it is to be feminine, how the female body should look, and appropriate female sexual behaviour. Representations (and expectations) of the female form and sexuality are well depicted in the Japanese manga: graphic novel artwork that is read ubiquitously t hroughout Japan. Exploration of this art-form and the culture that grows around it provides a unique insight into current cultural attitudes in Japan. Shojo manga -Read MoreGender And Sexuality : Article On Sexualised Insult Fag By American Teenage Boys1626 Words   |  7 PagesBoth terms ‘gender’ and ‘sexuality’ are very common, broad and the meaning of it differs from person to person. Eugenically the term ‘gender’ is defined to have socially composed roles, activities, behaviours, and peculiarity that a given society considers right for men and women (WHO, 2015). Whereas the term ‘sexuality’ has various meanings, it is described as feeling or having attraction or having sexual thoughts and preferences towards same sex or opposite sex (reachout.com, 2015). This essayRead MoreSexuality Is Defined By Sexual Orientation1538 Words   |  7 PagesSexuality is defined by â€Å"sexual orientation or preference† as well as th e ability to understand the capacity of sexual desires. Same sex sexuality refers to sexual orientation also, but one’s preference towards someone of their same gender and the â€Å"erotic thoughts, feelings and behaviours† they assign to those of the same sex. Culturally, same sex sexuality is not always based on sexual ideals, acts that could be defined as being homosexual and appealing to those with same sex sexuality, oftenRead MoreSocio-Cultural Influences On Sexuality. Socio-Cultural1156 Words   |  5 PagesSocio-Cultural Influences on Sexuality Socio-cultural influence plays a major role in sexual behaviors. It gives a better comprehension on why men are men and women are women. These socio-cultural are influenced by physical, emotional, cultural and economic aspects. Time and time again research has proven that socio-cultural influences have a significant role in human sexuality. Culture is the manner of life of the people. Thus, culture shapes the ideas of what behaviors are acceptable for men andRead MoreEssay on Our Understanding of Sexuality and Family Formation1213 Words   |  5 PagesOur Understanding of Sexuality and Family Formation The investigations in the determinants of gender and sexuality are ongoing; some are biologically orientated while others believe that they are socially constructed. This essay will discuss the idea that our understanding of sexuality and gender is linked to our understanding of family formations. It will highlight the diversities and the relationships of sexuality, gender and the family. It will also draw attentionRead MoreVisual images Reinforce Traditional Gender and Sexuality Stereotypes948 Words   |  4 PagesVisual images reinforce traditional gender and sexuality stereotypes through the manifestation of the masculine and feminine miens. An examination of print media advertisements highlights the social and cultural ideologies associated with traditional gender roles that are expected and imposed on by society. â€Å"Advertisements are deeply woven into the fabric of Western Culture, drawing on and reinforcing commonly held perceptions and beliefs† of gender and sexuality stereotypes. They have a strong roleRead MoreSexuality and the development of a sexual selfhood is a development that can occur during900 Words   |  4 PagesSexuality and the development of a sexual selfhood is a development that can occur during adolescence. While this categorical event may be universal, how it is experienced is unique based on personal, social, and contextual reasons. This development arises from an intertwining of physiological and psychological processes and is tightly related to identity. Historically, research on sexuality has been driven by a public health agenda, which is overshadowed by moral panic and bad outcomes of adolescentRead MoreConflicting Paradigms On Gender And Sexuality1453 Words   |  6 PagesAriella Melamed Professor Salerno SYG 1000 September 30th, 2016 Conflicting Paradigms on Gender and Sexuality in Rap Music: Review Introduction: The article I am researching and analyzing is â€Å"Conflicting Paradigms on Gender and Sexuality in Rap Music: A Systematic Review† written by Denise Herd. This article was published in the academic journal â€Å"Sexuality and Culture†, on July 1st, 2000. This article is centered around rap music with its social and cultural significance for youth audiences, all

Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at Aes Free Essays

string(44) " portfolio of contract generation projects\." Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES In June 2003, Rob Venerus, director of the newly created Corporate Analysis Planning group at The AES Corporation, thumbed through the five-inch stack of financial results from subsidiaries and considered the breadth and scale of AES. In the 12 years since it had gone public, AES had become a leading independent supplier of electricity in the world with more than $33 billion in assets stretched across 30 countries and 5 continents.Venerus now faced the daunting task of creating a methodology for calculating costs of capital for valuation and capital budgeting at AES businesses in diverse locations around the world. We will write a custom essay sample on Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at Aes or any similar topic only for you Order Now He would need more than his considerable daily dose of caffeine to point himself in the right direction. Much of AES’s expansion had taken place in developing markets where the unmet demand for energy far exceeded that of more developed countries. By 2000, the majority of AES revenues came from overseas operations; approximately one-third came from South America alone.Once a critical element in its recipe for success, the company’s international exposure hurt AES during the global economic downturn that began in late 2000. A confluence of factors including the devaluation of key South American currencies, adverse changes in energy regulatory environments, and declines in energy commodity prices conspired to weaken cash flow at AES subsidiaries and hinder the company’s ability to service subsidiary and parent-level debt.As earnings and cash distributions to the parent started to deteriorate, AES stock collapsed and its market capitalization fell nearly 95% from $ 28 billion in December 2000 to $1. 6 billion just two years later. As one part of its response to the financial crisis, AES leadership created the Corporate Analysis Planning group in order to address current and future strategic and financial challenges. To begin the process, the CEO and board of directors asked Venerus, as director of the new group, to revalue the company’s existing assets, which required creating a new method of calculating the cost of capital for AES businesses.Central to the questions facing Venerus was the international scope of AES, as he explained: â€Å"As a global company with operations in countries that are hugely different from the U. S. , we need a more sophisticated way to think about risk and our cost of capital around the world. And, frankly, the finance textbooks aren’t that helpful on this subject. † The mandate from the board of AES to create a new methodology presented an interesting but overwhelming challenge. As he prepared his materials for the board, Venerus wondered if his new approach would balance the complexities of the unique business situations around the world with ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Professor Mihir Desai and Research Associate Doug Schillinger prepared this case. HBS cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not intended to serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations of effective or ineffective management.Copyright  © 2004 President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to http://www. hbsp. harvard. edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Harvard Business School. 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES he need for a simple, straightforward process that could be implemented accurately and consistently throughout the organization. AES Corporation1 Roger Sant (MBA ’60, HBS) and Dennis Bakke (MBA ’70, HBS) founded AES Corporation (originally Applied Energy Services) in 1981 shortly after the adoption of federal legislation that became known as the Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA). The legislation was part of the United States government’s reaction to growing concern over American dependence on foreign oil.The act sought to diminish this dependence by requiring that electric utilities source some of their new power needs through qualified cogenerators and small independent power producers, provided that the power generated by independents cost less than if the utility were to produce the power itself. Sant and Bakke recognized that in shielding small independent power producers from costly state and federal regulation, PURPA actually created a market for a new private sector power market. In practice, the act almost ensured that independent power producers could undercut a utility’s cost of production. The company initially struggled to raise financing but after the construction of its first cogeneration facility in Houston, Texas, in 1983 and the subsequent development of a profitable cogeneration facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1985, AES experienced rapid growth. By the time the company went public in 1991, revenues had grown to $330 million and net income had soared to $42. million from $1. 6 million just three years earlier. In the early 1990s, AES began to shift its focus overseas where there were more abundant opportunities for the company to apply its nonrecourse, project finance model to the development of contracted generating facilities. In addition, foreign governments often provided incentives to attract foreign direct investment in infrastructure projects like power plants. The willingness of international development banks to invest alongside AES in volatile parts of the world helped mitigate the risk of expropriation, and the increased breadth of the global financial markets provided greater access to capital. AES initiated its international expansion in 1991–1992 with the purchase of two plants in Northern Ireland. The following year, AES began what would become a massive expansion into Latin America with the acquisition of the San Nicolas generation facility in Buenos Aires, Argentina.A year later, AES created a separately listed subsidiary, AES China Generating Co. , to advance Chinese development projects. As the pace of deregulation quickened around the world, AES was presented with an abundant supply of capital and a wealth of opportunities for investments in energy-related businesses, some of which were more complex than AES’ portfolio of contract generation projects. You read "Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at Aes" in category "Papers" In addition to expanding its line of business profile, it continued its geographic expansion and between 1996 and 1998 the company acquired several large utility companies in Brazil, El Salvador, and Argentina. By this time the company was spending an estimated 80%–85% of its capital investment overseas in places as diverse as Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, Cameroon, The Dominican Republic, Georgia, Hungary, India, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands, Mexico, Pakistan, Panama, Puerto Rico, Ukraine, The United Kingdom, and Venezuela. 2 1 Much of this overview comes from Paula Kepos, ed. , International Directories of Company Histories, Volume 10 (Detroit: St. James Press, 1995), pp. 25–27. 2 Paula Kepos, ed. , International Directories of Company Histories, Volume 53. (Detroit: St. James Press, 1995), p. 17. 2Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 AES in 2002 By 2002, AES was one of the largest independent power producers in the world. (See Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 for AES consolidated financial statements. ) The company was organized around four separate lines of business: Contract Generation, Competitive Supply, Large Utilities, and Growth Distribution. 3 Contract generation In 2002, AES’s Contract Generation business accounted for approximately 29% of AES revenues and consisted of generation facilities, which sold electricity under long-term (five years or longer) contracts. The term of the contracts allowed AES to limit its exposure to volatility in electricity prices. The resulting stable production requirements enabled AES to accurately predict supply needs and enter into similarly long-term agreements for coal, natural gas, and fuel oil, thereby limiting its exposure to fuel price volatility. Facilities varied considerably in size, with plants as small as the 26 MW Xiangci-Cili hydro plant in China to the enormous 10-plant 2,650 MW Tiete hydro complex in Brazil. Competitive supply Accounting for 21% of AES revenues, the Competitive Supply line of business old electricity directly to wholesale and retail customers in competitive markets using shorter-term contracts or daily spot prices. Competitive Supply businesses, sometimes called â€Å"merchant plants,† were highly susceptible to changes in the price of electricity, natural gas, coal, oil and other raw materials. AES’s margin in U. S. dollars was influenced by a host of factors including weather conditions, competition, changes in market regulations, interest rate and foreign exchange fluctuations, and availability and price of emissions credits.Such price volatility had recently damaged several Competitive Supply businesses including the Drax plant in the U. K. , the largest plant in AES’s Competitive Supply fleet. 4 Large utilities By the end of 2002, the Large Utility business included only three major utilities, each in a different country: Indiana Power and Light Company in the U. S. (IPALCO), Eletropaulo Metropolitana Electricidade de Sao Paulo S. A. in Brazil (Eletropaulo), and C. A. La Electricidad de Caracas in Venezuela (EDC). These utilities combined generation, transmission and distribution capabilities and were subject to local government regulation and price setting.All three enjoyed regional monopolies and in total accounted for 36% of AES revenues. U. S. energy regulations had required AES to sell a fourth such company, Central Indiana Light and Power (CILCORP), when AES purchased IPALCO, a sale that was completed near the end of 2002. Growth distribution Growth Distribution businesses offered AES significant potential growth due to their location in developing markets where the demand for electricity was expected to grow at considerably faster rates than in developed countries.However, these businesses also faced notable risks related to operating difficulties, less stable governments, and regulatory regimes, and differing cultural norms regarding basic principles such as payment conventions and safety regulations. Two new Growth Distribution businesses in Ukraine (Kievoblenergo and Rivoblenergo) and one in Cameroon (SONEL) were acquired as recently as 2001. 3 The description for these lines of businesses comes largely from AES’s annual reports; see AES Corporation, 2001 Annual Report (Arlington: AES Corporation, 2002) an d AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report (Arlington: AES Corporation, 2003). Energy companies typically refer to generation companies not as members of a â€Å"portfolio† but members of a â€Å"fleet. † 3 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Recent Difficulties AES’s placement in foreign markets as well as poor performance at several new U. S. businesses nearly crippled the company during the global economic slowdown that began in 2001. AES’s market value started to fall slowly in 2001 but fell precipitously in 2002. Having traded for more than $70 per share in October 2000, AES stock hovered around $1 per share in the same month of 2002 (see Exhibit 4).Wall Street began to question the company’s ability to weather the storm, and one analyst wrote, â€Å"It is clear that AES’s current stock price is reflecting the scenario that the company will not survive. †5 The collapse of the stock price and the subsequent $3. 5 billion loss that included a substantial write-off in 2002 were brought on by several factors, the effect of which was amplified by AES’s capital structure. Among these factors were adverse shifts in foreign exchange markets, regulatory policies, and commodity prices; many of these were factors AES could not fully protect itself against.Currency Devaluations During 2001, a political and economic crisis in Argentina brought about a significant devaluation of most South American currencies against the U. S. dollar. In December, the newly elected government abandoned the country’s fixed dollar-to-Argentine-peso exchange rate (1:1) and converted U. S. dollar-denominated loans into pesos. On its first day of trading as a floating currency, the peso lost 40% of its value against the U. S. dollar. 6 By the end of the year, the peso was trading at a rate of 3. 32 pesos to the U. S. dollar and had been as high as 3. pesos. 7 The currencies in Brazil and Venezuela—equally important markets for AES—followed suit, with the Brazilian Real and the Venezuelan Bolivar each depreciating approximately 50% against the U. S. dollar during the same period (see Exhibit 5). As a result, AES recorded foreign currency transaction losses of $456 million in 2002. Several of AES’s subsidiaries in South America defaulted on their debt and were forced to restructure. The debt was nonrecourse to the parent, AES Corporation, so AES was not obligated to service the subsidiary debt.However, the parent company did suffer from cash flow shortfalls as a result of lower-than-expected dividends back from the subsidiaries. The impact of devaluation was increased when foreign businesses were paid in local currency but had obligations to repay debt denominated in U. S. dollars. Adverse Regulatory Changes During the late 1990s, the regulatory agencies in Brazil had failed to produce a market structure sufficiently attractive to encourage domestic construction of new generation assets. Demand exceeded supply, causing shortages. The majority of Brazil’s generation capacity was hydroelectric, and energy deficiencies were exacerbated in 2001 and 2002 by below-average rainfall. In response, the Brazilian regulatory authorities began rationing energy consumption in June 2001. 8 In addition to the loss of sales volume, the decline of the Brazilian real against the dollar triggered a regulatory 5 Ali Agha and Ed Yuen, Banc of America Securities, â€Å"AES Corporation, Analysis of Sales and Earnings,† October 25, 2002, available from The Investext Group, http://www. nvestext. com, accessed July 15, 2003. 6 â€Å"Argentina’s Peso I Expected to Face Pressure This Week,† The Wall Street Journal, January 14, 2002, available from Factiva, http://www. factiva. com, accessed July 7, 2003. 7 AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report (Arlington: AES Corporation, 2003), p. 38. 8 Ibid. , p. 20. 4 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 conflict concerning the applicable exchange rate for the real-to-dollar energy-cost pass-through provisions in AES’s contract. In effect, the government of Brazil required AES to purchase energy in dollars while reimbursing the costs using an earlier period exchange rate, which lagged the deflation. In the fourth quarter of 2002, AES took a pretax impairment charge of approximately $756 million on Eletropaulo, one of its major Brazilian businesses. Commodity Prices Decline A 2001 change in the regulatory regime in the U. K. also adversely impacted AES by increasing competition and reducing prices in its generation markets. That, along with an unusually warm winter in the U. K. brought wholesale electricity prices down approximately 30%. 9 These pressures caused several counterparties to default on their long-term purchase agreements. This counterpart risk, coupled with changes in the commodity markets, enhanced the financial pressure on AES facilities, and those that could not sell electricity above their marginal costs were taken off-line or shut down. Above and beyond the currency and regulatory difficulties at AES, the company was forced to take significant impairment charges on unprofitable or discontinued businesses.In 2002, the company took after-tax charges of $465 million on development and construction projects, $301 million on discontinued operations, and a massive $2. 3 billion in asset impairments associated with several large utility and generation businesses. 10 AES Reaction In response to the financial crisis, AES successfully refinanced $2. 1 billion of bank loans and debt securities. The refinancing arrangement came through the day before AES was to pay down $380 million of its outstanding debt. A group of 63 banks and investment funds agreed to provide $1. billion in new loans, and AES secured a two-year extension on another $500 million in notes due in 2002. 11 AES also secured agreements to sell a number of its assets. Total proceeds from the sales were expected to be approximately $819 million. Proceeds from sales in 2003 were expected to be approximately $310 million. 12 Capital Budgeting at AES Historically, capital budgeting at AES was fairly straightforward. When AES undertook primarily domestic contract generation projects where the risk of changes to input and output prices was minimal, a project finance framework was employed.Venerus explained that this framework consisted of a fairly simple set of rules—all nonrecourse debt was deemed good, the economics of a given project were evaluated at an equity discount rate for the dividends from the project, all 9 AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report, p. 21. 10 Ibid. , p. 37. Eletropaulo. The $2. 3 billion in asset impairment charges included the $706 million after tax impairment charge at 11 â€Å"AES Stock Shoots Up as Refinancing Keeps Bankruptcy at Bay,† The Washington Post, December 17, 2002, available from Factiva, http://www. factiva. om, accessed July 17, 2003. 12 AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report, p. 36. 5 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES dividend flows were considered equally risky, and a 12% discount rate was used for all projects. In a world of domestic contract-generation projects where most risks could be hedged and businesses had similar capital structures, Venerus felt that this model worked fairly well. Beginning in the early 1990s, with AES’s international expansions, this model of capital budgeting was exported to projects overseas.Early on, the model worked well (as it had with the initial expansion in Northern Ireland), because this project had many of the characteristics of domestic opportunities. Venerus explained that the model became increasingly strained with the expansions in Brazil and Argentina because hedging key exposures such as regulatory or currency risk was not feasible. In addition, the financial structure of a going-concern business like a utility is notably different than that of a limited-lifespan asset like a generating facility. Nonetheless, in the absence of an academic or other alternative, the basic methodology remained intact. Another factor that created fundamental difficulties for transporting this model to overseas settings was the ever-increasing complexity in the financing of international operations. As one example of this, Venerus described how international operations would be evaluated and financed. Exhibit 6 illustrates the typical structure: subsidiary A and B were financed with debt that was nonrecourse to the parent. The subsidiaries’ creditors had claims on the hard assets at the power plants but not on any other AES affiliate or subsidiary.The local holding company, which often represented multiple subsidiaries, also borrowed to finance construction or acquisitions and received equity in the various subsidiaries it held. In addition, the holding company had debt that was nonrecourse to the parent, secured by dividends from the operating company. Finally, AES borrowed once again at the parent level in order to contribute equity dollars into holding companies and subsidiary projects. At the end of 2002, AES had $5. 8 billion in parent company (recourse) debt and $14. 2 billion in nonrecourse debt.Using this subsidiary structure, the parent company received cash flows in the form of dividends from each subsidiary (some of which were holding companies) and, because the structure of every investment opportunity was essentially the same, all dividend flows were evaluated at the same 12% discount rate. This had the benefit of making similar projects seemingly comparable. However, when subsidiaries’ local currency real exchange rates depreciated, leverage at the subsidiary and holding company level effectively increased, and the subsidiaries struggled to service their foreign currency debt.Venerus recalled how the model started to crumble in early international investments: Imagine a real devaluation of 50%. That cuts EBITDA in dollar terms by 50% and coverage ratios deteriorate by more than 50%. The local holding company cannot service its borrowing, and dividends to the parent are slashed. Ultimately the consolidated leverage was well over 80% without any hedging of foreign exchange for any meaningful duration; this is where the model broke down. Venerus’s solution to the problem had to be consistent, transparent, and accessible. He knew his olution would have to account for changes in required returns due to leverage, incorporate some understanding of a project’s risk profile, potentially include country risks, and still provide values that were consistent with market behavior, including trading multiples. Globalizing the Cost of Capital To overhaul the capital budgeting process and evaluate each investment as a distinct opportunity with unique risks, Venerus knew he would have to calculate a cost of capital for each of the many diverse AES businesses. As a starting poi nt, he considered the 15 representative projects shown in 6Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 7a and, using the financial data in Exhibit 7b, he endeavored to derive a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for each project using a standard methodology: WACC = E D re + rd (1 ? ? ) V V In order to calculate each WACC, Venerus knew he would have to measure all of the constituent parts for the 15 projects: the cost of debt, the target capital structure, the local country tax rates, and an appropriate cost of equity. In order to find the cost of equity, he would first have to estimate a reasonable equity beta.Venerus questioned whether the traditional CAPM model could help him calculate all of the necessary ingredients for AES businesses in emerging markets. He did not advocate the use of a â€Å"World CAPM† where beta measured the covariance of a project’s return to the world market portfolio of equities. AES owned businesses in poorly integrated capital markets, so Venerus feared the use of a World CAPM might yield artificially low costs of capital due to the low (or in some cases negative) correlation of developing economies with the world market.For example, a world CAPM might generate the unreasonable result of a WACC lower than the U. S. risk-free rate due to its negative correlation with the world market portfolio. Similarly, Venerus did not advocate the use of a â€Å"Local CAPM† where beta measured the covariance of a project’s returns with a portfolio of local equities. Countries such as Tanzania or Georgia, where AES had projects, did not have any meaningful equity markets or local benchmarks. Still, he knew he had to find a way to capture the country-specific risks in foreign markets.At a high level, Venerus developed an approach with two parts. First, he calculated a cost of debt and cost of equity for each of the 15 projects using U. S. market data. Second, he added the difference between the yield on local government bonds and the yield on corresponding U. S. Treasury bonds to both the cost of debt and the cost of equity. Venerus believed that this difference or â€Å"sovereign spread† approximated the incremental borrowing costs (and market risk) in the local country. Exhibit 8 summarizes Venerus’s approach.Calculating the Cost of Equity and the Cost of Debt To estimate an equity beta for each project, Venerus first had the Corporate Analysis Planning group take unlevered equity betas from comparable U. S. companies. They averaged the betas to yield one unlevered beta for each of the four lines of business. Since the equity betas reflected not only the market risk associated with each company, but also the differential effects of leverage, the group relevered the equity betas at indicative capital structures for each of the 15 projects using the following equation: levered = ? unlevered E V Using the relevered equity betas, Venerus had the group calculate the cost of equity for each project using the traditional CAPM equation: Cost of Equity = r f + ? rm ? r f ( ) 7 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Finally, an appropriate cost of debt needed to be calculated. Given the significant regulatory and market changes impacting AES over the previous two years, Venerus decided not to use the historical cost of debt which might reflect market conditions that no longer existed.Instead, he attempted to estimate the return on debt demanded by investors given the cash flow risks of a given project. To do so, he applied the following equation: Cost of Debt = r f + Default Spread The estimation of â€Å"default spread† was based upon the observed relationship between EBIT coverage ratios for comparable energy companies and their cost of debt (shown in Exhibits 9a and 9b). The group estimated the appropriate EBIT coverage ratio for each project given its volatility of cash flows and leverage. Then, using the observed relationship, they assigned the commensurate cost of debt.For example, a project with a target EBIT coverage ratio of 3. 0x was assigned a default spread of approximately 300 bp. Adding the Sovereign Spread13 Before plugging the cost of equity and cost of debt into the WACC equation, Venerus wanted to account for country-specific market risk. He believed that risk could be captured in the difference between local government bond yields and the corresponding U. S. Treasury yields, or the â€Å"sovereign spread. † Thus, he added the spreads found in Exhibit 10 to both the cost of equity and cost of debt and used those values to generate a WACC for each project.WACC Adjustments for Unsystematic Risk Venerus knew the above CAPM-based sovereign spread approach could provide AES with a useful WACC reflecting the systematic risk associated with each project according to its local market. However, was the approach reasonable in developing markets where access to capital was limited and information was less than perfect? Venerus believed that company-specific risk could not be easily diversified away in such markets. Moreover, AES—as an â€Å"investor† looking for potential projects—could not diversify in the same way a portfolio manager might diversify.Perhaps most importantly, Venerus was concerned that calculating expected cash flows by a probability-weighted average of various outcomes would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to do accurately or consistently across the entire AES portfolio, even without the urgency of his present task. He felt budgeted cash flows would be more readily available. Thus, he believed the appropriate discount rate for AES businesses should account for some level of project-specific risk. Even if expected cash flows were available, Venerus felt that some degree of project-specific risk deserved consideration.Venerus illustrated his point with an example: Consider two hydro plants in Brazil that are identical in every respect except the hydrological risk of the rivers that feed them. Both plants have the same probability-weighted expected value cash flows. The hydrology of plant #1 produces cash flows that can vary by plus or minus 50% in a given year. The hydrology of plant #2 produces cash flows that can vary by plus or minus 10% in a given year. If both these plants are financed with 100% equity and pay no taxes, CAPM tells us that these plants are worth the same amount.That, to me, is unconvincing. 13 Also referred to as the â€Å"country spread model† or the â€Å"Goldman Model. † See Jorge O. Mariscal and Rafaelina M. Lee, Goldman Sachs, â€Å"The Valuation of Mexican Stocks: An Extension of the Capital Asset Pricing Model,† 1993. 8 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 In order to compensate for this â€Å"undiversifiable project-specific risk,† the Corporate Analysis Planning group created a risk scoring system designed to supplement the initial cost of capital. First, seven categories of project-level risk were identified.Each category was ranked and weighted according to AES’s ability to anticipate and mitigate certain risks. For example, because AES was unable to hedge changes in currencies in certain markets, â€Å"currency risk† received a high weight and rank. In contrast, AES felt it could control for most technical or plant-related problems and, as such, â€Å"operational risks† received a relatively low weight. See Exhibit 11 for the seven risks and examples for each. Second, projects were graded on their level of exposure to the seven categories of project risk.For each category, a project was assigned a grade between 0 (lowest exposure) and 3 (highest exposure). Next, the grades were multiplied by the respective weights and the seven categories added together to yield a single business-specific risk score. For example, Table A shows how the Lal Pir project, a contract generation business in Pakistan, might be assigned grades that translated into a businessspecific risk score of 1. 41. Table A Risk Score Calculation for Lal Pir Project Grade for Lal Pir 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 Risk Scores (grade x weight) 0. 035 0. 070 0. 210 0. 00 0. 180 0. 430 0. 500 1. 425 Categories of Risk Operational/Technical Counterparty Credit/Performance Regulatory Construction Commodity Currency Contractual Enforcement/Legal Sum of individual scores = business-specific risk score Source: Company document (actual assessments disguised). Weight 3. 5% 7. 0% 10. 5% 14. 5% 18. 0% 21. 5% 25. 0% Finally, the business-specific risk scores were used to calculate an adjustment to the initial cost of capital. The lowest business-specific risk scores (score = 0) received no adjustment to the calculated cost of capital.For projects with the highest business-specific risk scores (score = 3), the cost of capital was increased by 1500 bp. The relationships between business-specific risk scores and adjustments to the cost of capital were linear. Thus, a business-specific risk score of 2 would yield an adjustment to WACC of 1000 bp, and a business-specific risk score of 1 would yield an adjustment of 500 bp. 14 Preparing for the Board Venerus reviewed his methodology and considered the mandate he had received from the board. In order to refine the capital budgeting process at AES, he ad to devise a coherent and practical way to define cost of capital in all of AES’s international markets. In his own mind, he went over the steps 14 AES also considered a more complicated non-linear algorithm to generate the WACC adjustment from the business-specific risk score. 9 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES in his process: calculate the cost of equity and the cost of debt using U. S. market data, add the sovereign spread to each, calculate WACC using a target capital structure, and finally, add a business- specific risk adjustment to WACC. Still, questions lingered in his mind. He reviewed the project cash flows for the AES Lal Pir contract generation plant in Pakistan presented in Exhibit 12 as a way of gauging the effect of his new methodology. In doing so, he considered the differences in value created by each of the adjustments to the discount rate. Was his discount rate an actual representation of the risk associated with the project? Did it yield the correct value? More generally, did the sovereign spreads accurately capture the market risk specific to a given country?Had he used the appropriate risk categories and suitable weights to reflect AES’s appetite for risk? It was time for him to decide. Should he move forward with the addition of the business-specific risk score or should he simply use the traditional sovereign spread model? The board’s reaction was impossible to predict. What if the results were inconsistent with observable trading multiples? Would they accuse him of creating an over-com plicated method, or would they applaud the new technique as a pragmatic way to calculate the cost of capital in an international context? 0 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 1 AES Consolidated Income Statement 2002 $4,317 4,315 8,632 (3,627) (3,086) (6,713) (112) (2,031) 312 219 (87) (1,600) (612) (456) (203) (2,651) (27) (34) (2,590) (573) (3,163) (346) $(3,509) 2001 $3,255 4,390 7,645 (2,416) (3,052) (5,468) (120) (131) (1,575) 189 116 (65) 18 (30) 176 755 206 103 446 (173) 273 $273 2000 $2,661 3,545 6,206 (2,093) (2,210) (4,303) (82) (79) (1,262) 201 51 (52) 143 (4) 475 1,294 368 120 806 (11) 795 $795Amounts in millions except per share figures Revenues Regulated Non-regulated Total revenues Cost of sales Regulated Non-regulated Total cost of sales SGA expenses Severance and transaction costs Interest expense Interest income Other income Other expense (Loss) gain on sale of investments and asset impairment expense Goodwill impairment exp ense Foreign currency transaction loss Equity in pre-tax (loss) earnings of affiliates (Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest Income tax (benefit) expense Minority interest (income expense) (Loss) income from continuing operations Loss from operations of dicontinued businesses (net of income tax benefit of $90, $10 and $5, respectively) (Loss) income before cumulative effect of accounting change Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (net of income tax benefit of $72) Net (loss) income BASIC (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE (Loss) income from continuing operations Discontinued operations Cumulative effect of accounting change Basic (loss) earnings per share Source: $(4. 81) $(1. 05) $(0. 65) $(6. 51) $0. 84 $(0. 32) $$0. 52 $1. 67 $(0. 01) $$1. 66 AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report (Arlington: AES Corporation, 2003). 11 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Exhibit 2 AES Consolidated Balance Sheet 002 $780 211 1,264 384 218 1,492 4,349 194 23,050 (4,204) 18,846 1,403 8,984 33,776 2001 $802 215 1,137 468 215 1,855 4,692 3,031 21,127 (3,015) 18,112 2,433 8,544 36,812 2000 $950 1,297 1,566 569 1,193 209 5,784 3,122 21,874 (2,632) 19,242 2,248 2,642 33,038 1999 $669 164 936 307 327 184 2,587 1,575 14,210 (763) 13,447 1,904 1,367 20,880 1998 $491 35 383 119 155 71 1,254 1,933 6,029 (525) 5,504 1,490 600 10,781 Amounts in millions, as of December 31 ASSETS Cash Equivalents Other Short-Term Investments Accounts Receivable Inventory Prepayments Advances Other Current Assets Total Current Assets Long-Term Investments Property Plant Equipment Accum Depr. Amort. Property Plant Equipment, Net Goodwill/Intangibles Other Long-Term Assets Total Assets LIABILITIES SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Accounts Payable Short-Term Debt Curr.Long-Term Debt and CLOs Other Current Liabilities Total Current Liabilities Long-Term Debt Total Long-Term Debt Deferred Taxes Other Long-Term Liabilities Total Liabilities Stockholder’s Equity Common Stock Additional Paid in Capital Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Other Equity Total Shareholders’ Equity Total Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity Shares Outstanding Source: â€Å"AES Annual Balance Sheet,† http://www. onesource. com. December 1,139 3,341 2,031 6,511 17,684 17,684 981 8,941 34,117 727 2,449 1,752 4,928 17,406 17,406 627 8,312 31,273 743 2,462 1,834 5,039 17,382 17,382 1,863 3,212 27,496 381 1,216 973 2,570 12,136 12,136 1,787 1,750 18,243 215 1,413 348 1,976 5,791 5,791 268 952 8,987 6 5,312 (700) (4,959) (341) 33,776 558 2003, 5 5,225 2,809 (2,500) 5,539 36,812 533 available from 5 5,172 2,551 (507) (1,679) 5,542 33,038 509 OneSource 4 2,615 1,120 (1,102) 2,637 20,880 414 1,243 892 (343) 1,794 10,781 361 Services, Information 12 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 3 AES 2002 Revenues by Line of Business and Geographic Region Line of Business $1,180 $3,137 Large Utilities $1,837 Contract Generation Competitive Power Supply Growth Distribution $2,478 Geographic Region $1,568 $2,783 South America North America Europe/Africa $1,739 Carribean $2,091 Source: AES Corporation, 2002 Annual Report. 13 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeti ng at AES Exhibit 4 AES Stock Price History, March 1996 through December 2002 $80. 00 $70. 00 $60. 00 $50. 00 $40. 00 $30. 00 20. 00 $10. 00 $12/1/96 12/1/97 12/1/98 12/1/99 12/1/00 12/1/01 12/1/02 3/1/96 6/1/96 9/1/96 3/1/97 6/1/97 9/1/97 3/1/98 6/1/98 9/1/98 3/1/99 6/1/99 9/1/99 3/1/00 6/1/00 9/1/00 3/1/01 6/1/01 9/1/01 3/1/02 6/1/02 9/1/02 Source: Note: Created by casewriter. Stock prices adjusted for splits. 14 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 5 Selected South American Exchange Rates (2001–2002) (local currency per U. S. dollar) 4. 0 3. 5 3. 0 2. 5 2. 0 1. 5 1. 0 0. 5 Jan-01 May-01 Brazilian Real (left) Source: Bloomberg LP. 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 Sep-01 Jan-02 May-02 Sep-02 Venezuelan Bolivar (right)Argentine Peso (left) 15 204-109 -16- Exhibit 6 Typical Structure of an AES Investment AES Parent Corporation Assets Liabilities US Bank Debt Equity subsidiary Equity holding co. Corporate Debt Local AES Holding Company Assets Liabilities $-denominated debt Equity subsidiary (non-recourse to parent) AES Subsidiary A Assets Liabilities Fossil fuel power plant $-denominated debt (non-recourse to parent) AES Subsidiary B Assets Liabilities Hyrdo power plant $-denominated debt (non-recourse to parent) Source: Company documents and casewriter analysis. 204-109 -17- Exhibit 7a Risk Scores AES Project Data Line of Project Description Spread 3. 57% 8. 3% 3 3 Spread 300 MW gas fired combined cycle plant currently under construction 30 km east of Santo Domingo 123 MW hydroelectric power plant located on the San Juan river in western Arg entina Largest coal-fired power station in western Europe. It can produce enough electricity – about 4000 MW- to meet the needs of approximately four million people Distribution company that serves a population of 14 million in Sao Paulo 277 MW fossil fuel plant located in Tocopilla, 1500 km north of Santiago 360 MW gas turbine facility located 25 kilometers southeast of Dhaka, capital of Bangladesh 600 MW coal fired power plant 337 MW coal fired power plant 210 MW Oil-fired facility supplying the capital city of Santo Domingo Joint Venture with the Government of Orissa. Two 210 MW P. C. oal-fired units Oil fired 140 MW cogeneration facility – under contracts of up to 10 years, electricity, steam, compressed air, dematerialized water and nitrogen to three chemical facilities adjacent to the plant 832 MW natural gas-fired plant Distribution Company serving 380,000 customers Distribution Company serving Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia. 600 MW gas-fired combined cycle power plant 7. 9% 25. 0% 23% 35. 1% 28. 7% 25% 32. 9% 0. 0% 33. 3% 2. 5x 17. 0% 35. 2% 2. 5x 4. 34% 34. 0% 30. 0% 3. 5x 2. 89% 0. 0% 29. 5% 3. 0x 3. 57% 0. 00% 35. 0% 40. 8% 3. 0x 3. 57% 16. 25% 3 25. 0% 35. 1% 3. 0x Tax Rate Debt to Cap. Coverage EBIT Default Sovereign Construction Operation/ Technical Regulatory Currency Counterparty Contract enf. / Legal 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 Andres Dominican Republic CG Caracoles Argentina CS 2 DraxUnited Kingdom CS – 2 Eletropaulo Brazil LU 8. 93% – 1 Gener Chile CG 1. 73% – – Haripur Bangladesh CG 4. 34% 5. 23% 2 – Kelvin South Africa CG 2. 5x 3. 0x 4. 0x 4. 34% 3. 57% 1. 85% 3. 14% 9. 90% 8. 93% 1 – 1 3 Lal Pir Pakistan CG Los Mina Dominican Republic CG OPGC India CG 30. 4% 3. 0x 3. 57% 3. 60% – 1 Ottana Italy CS 35. 0% 42. 5% 2. 5x 4. 34% 0. 14% – – Red Oak USA CG 37. 5% 30. 0% 20. 0% 34. 0% 39. 5% 36. 5% 26. 1% 32. 2% 3. 0x 2. 5x 4. 0x 4. 0x 3. 57% 3. 57% 1. 85% 1. 85% 0. 00% 9. 98% 9. 98% 8. 93% – 2 2 – Rivnoblenergo Ukraine GD Telasi Georgia GD Uruguaiana Brazil CG Source: Company document. Project descriptions taken from http://www. aes. om/businesses/default. asp. Commodity 3 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 2 3 2 Business / Project Country Business 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Exhibit 7b AES Selected Financial Data Select Financial Information 10-Year U. S. Treasury Bond U. S. Risk Premium Unlevered Equity Betas by Line of Business Contract Generation Large Utility Growth Distribution Competitive Supply 4. 5% 7. 00% 0. 25 0. 25 0. 25 0. 50 Source: Company document. Exhibit 8 Summary of WACC Calculations for AES Step 1. Calculate unlevered equity beta. 2. Relever equity betas at target capital structure. 3. Calculate cost of equity for each AES business.Required Information †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ Betas at comparable U. S. companies Target capitalization ratios Risk-free rate Equity risk premium Relevered equity beta Risk-free rate Default spread Approach Unlever and average equity betas for comparables in each AES line of business Estimated by project using cash flows to calculate desired EBIT coverage 10-Year U. S. Treasury Note Long-term avg. difference between SP 500 and U. S. Treasuries 10-Year U. S. Treasury Note Observed relationship between EBIT coverage ratios for comparable companies and their costs of debt The difference between local government dollardenominated bond yields and the corresponding U. S.Treasury Note 4. Calculate the cost of debt. †¢ †¢ 5. Add country specific risk to the cost of debt and cost of equity. †¢ Local sovereign spread Source: Company document and casewriter analysis. 18 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 9a EBIT Coverage Ratios and Default Spreads 25. 0x 12. 0% 20. 0x 10. 0% 8. 0% 15. 0x 6. 0% 10. 0x 4. 0% 5. 0x 2. 0% Baa1 Baa2 Baa3 Caa1 Caa2 Caa3 Ba1 Ba2 Ba3 B1 B2 Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 Aaa A3 B3 – EBIT Coverage Ratio Source: Company documents. Default Spread 19 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Exhibit 9b EBIT Coverage Ratios and Default SpreadsCredit Rating Aaa Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 A3 Baa1 Baa2 Baa3 Ba1 Ba2 Ba3 B1 B2 B3 Caa1 Caa2 Caa3 EBIT Coverage Ratio 21. 1x 15. 1x 10. 9x 8. 1x 6. 3x 5. 2x 4. 6x 4. 2x 3. 9x 3. 6x 3. 2x 2. 6x 1. 9x 1. 0x 0. 8x 0. 6x 0. 4x 0. 1x 0. 1x Default Spread 0. 2% 0. 3% 0. 4% 0. 6% 0. 7% 0. 9% 1. 2% 1. 5% 1. 9% 2. 3% 2. 9% 3. 6% 4. 3% 5. 2% 6. 2% 7. 4% 8. 6% 10. 0% 11. 4% Source: Company documents. 20 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES 204-109 Exhibit 10 Credit Ratings and Sovereign Spreads Used by AES US (AAA) Australia (AAA) Bahamas (n/a) Canada (AAA) UK (AAA) Italy (AAA) Spain (AAA) Netherlands (AAA) Hungary (A-) Chile (A-) Qatar (A-)Czech Republic (A-) Mexico (BBB) China (BBB) Oman (BBB) South Africa (BBB-) India (BB) Bangladesh (n/a) Sri Lanka (n/a) El Salvador (BB+) Kazakhstan (BB) Panama (BB) Brazil (BB) Dominican Republic (BB-) Bolivia (B) Georgia (n/a) Pakistan (B) Ukraine (B) Venezuela (CCC+) Argentina (D) Cameroon (n/a) Nigeria (n/a) Tanzania (n/a) Uganda (n/a) 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% Source: Company document; Standard and Poor’s and Lehman Brothers. 21 204-109 Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES Exhibit 11 Project Specific Risk Categories and Weightings Risk Category Operational Example An AES plant may fail to operate at capacity or fail to produce sufficient electricity to meet contractual obligations. AES has offtake agreements that—like futures and other derivative instruments—require credit; the counterparty may either fail to post additional collateral as required or fail to pay. Contract settlement processes in a foreign country may change after AES has made investments in a generation facility. Regulatory agencies may choose not to adjust rates for a utility after inflation goes up or other market dynamics change. Construction of a specific plant is complete but the plant may not perform they way it is supposed to (the heat rate is too high, the output too low, the availability too low, etc. ). Prices of coal, oil, or other fuels may spike. How to cite Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at Aes, Papers

Annonated Bibliography free essay sample

The author explains how hip-hop artists can not only use their none to buy big houses and cars but also invest into business that would show good examples to their fans; it would therefore create job opportunities. Wade explains how some Of the money earned can be invest in big companies as Energy, Technology, or in job training that would help the lower class as more rooms would open. He believes during all these big award ceremonies artists should acknowledge those between them that contribute in the expansion of the country and encourage other to get involved.He states that if people are willing to spend money to look like hem, they would surely see no issues in wanting to get up and do something that would actually define them instead of following someones dream. This essay answers the questions I have regarding the economical perspective hip-hop might have on our society and how artists can give back to the society that allows and encourages them to live their dreams. What I dont really understand is the concept why artists would feel the urge to help the economy. Is our government not good enough to handle it? Sagging, Kathy. Researcher cites negative influences of hip-hop. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 13 June 2008: n. Gag.Pittsburgh Post-Gazette In this magazine, the author explains the negative effects hip-hop has on the society and states his blast with strong argument. More kids are taking the messages convey In this music as motto or determination In life that dont even apply to real life says the author. He explains how hip-hop tarnishes the Image of girls as brainless with a nice body. Also, they appear with provocative clothes that basically ask girls to dress less in order to get some attention. In addition, Sagging thinks that looking at he sexual imagery convey trough the videos really impacts the functioning of girls.This article takes a different perspective on hip-hop. At the beginning of the article, the author do acknowledge the fact that hip-hop is considered bad for the directed to the general audience and has for purpose to show the good side of hip- hop on our teens. The author is definitely an advocate of hip-hop. He describes the hip-hop as a unifier of diverse populations when it all started here in the United States. In addition, he accentuates the fact that hip-hop has help teens to be aware f the conditions they face in society and enable them to discuss ways in which they can make a positive change in society.This article is relevant to me because not only it has good positive effects of hi-hop but also greatly balances it with the negative facts people only choose to see. This article will definitely help me in my paper because its full of solid arguments I need to backup this perspective of the paper. I will also be presenting the contrasts the author establishes between the positive and negative effects of hip-hop to convey a certain idea in my paper.